" />--}}

DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF YOUTUBE CHILDREN SONGS ON THE L2ACQUISITION OF PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN: A CASE STUDY

Angelilka B. Babilonia, Revalyn Claire R. Ibo, Christina C Laxarno

Abstract


This research aimed to look into direct and indirect effects of YouTube children songs on the L2 acquisition of preschool children. The researchers’ formulated three main questions in this study: (1) what is the effect of indirect exposure to YouTube children songs on the L2 acquisition of preschool child? (2) What is the effect of direct exposure to YouTube children songs on the L2 acquisition of preschool child? (3) Is there a significant difference between the children with direct and indirect exposure to YouTube children songs? To answer the research questions, the researchers utilized a qualitative research design. The researchers observed and recorded the session with the child for the data collection. Research ethics was properly observed in data gathering. Additionally, the researchers used a statistical tool to determine the significant difference in the participants L2 acquisition. Also, researchers used observational analysis to analyze the collected data from recorded video and test results. Furthermore, the findings showed that a child with direct exposure to YouTube songs shows more progress than a child with indirect exposure. Exposure to YouTube songs can help children learn because they can increase engagement, create a desired environment, improve concentration and memory, and keep children on task.

Keywords


: Direct and Indirect Effects, Language Acquisition; Second Language Learning; YouTube Songs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, A. Su. E. G. (1996). Phonological working memory and spoken

language development in young children. Test, (1), 216–

https://doi.org/10.1080/713755610

Ellis, R. (1986). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford

Uni-versity Press https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007038

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2002). An Introduction to Language.

Bos-ton: Wadsworth

Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory

course (3rd ed.).

Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932841

Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2008). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition: An

Introductory Course. Oxford: Blackwell.

https://blogs.umass.edu/moiry/files/2015/08/Gass.Second- LanguageAcquisition.pdf

Kenney, S. (2005). Nursery rhymes: Foundations for learning. General Music

Today, 19 (1),28–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/10483713050190010108

Krashen, S. D. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning.

Prentice-Hall

International, 1988. 10.37514/JBW-J.1986.5.2.07

Krashen, S. (2018). The Conduit Hypothesis: How reading leads to academic

language competence .Language Magazine, May 2018.

https://www.languagemagazine.com/2018/05/01/the-conduithypothesis/10.5539/elt.v13n8p200

Leader, A. (2016). Background Noise May Hurt Toddlers’ Ability to Learn Words

https://leader.pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/leader.RIB1.21102016.12

Manuel and Medel (1976). ‘What is descriptive research method according to?’.

https://askinglot.com/what-is-descriptive-research-method-according-to

Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (1998). Second Language Learning Theories.

https://vulms.vu.edu.pk/Courses/ENG505/Downloads/Second-LanguageLearning- Theories.pdf

Phillips, S. (1993). Young Learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Purcell, J. M. (1992). Using songs to enrich the class. Hispania, 75 (1), 192-196




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v3i2.2063

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN ONLINE: 2775-8834